You are in Guest mode. If you want to post, you'll need to register (we promise it's painless).
Registered users should log in now. (Forgot your password?)
|
|
Photography.80 |
|
Panoramics--Let's get W-I-D-E |
{Photography.80.1}: Rich Mason {richpix} Fri, 25 Feb 2005 22:05:40 EST (HTML)
Here's my first contribution:
The view from Astoria, Oregon, across the Columbia River to Washington State--as seen from a window of the place I'm staying. This is only my second attempt at a stitched panorama, and I still have much to learn. To wit: It's very important to have the tripod head perfectly level when putting 19 pictures together. I ended up doing a bit of cropping and rotating to level the horizon--enough that the 150 MB file went down to 130 MB (reduced to less than 60 Kb here)--and I thought I had it fairly level when I started tripping the shutter.
It's important to use the same shutter and aperture settings for all
the pictures to be used in stitching. Fortunately I knew and
remembered this. Unfortunately, I didn't remember to take the camera
off auto white balance the first time and had to repeat the set,
thereby missing the perfect light which inspired me in the first
place.
{Photography.80.2}: Paddrick Mackin {paddrick} Sat, 26 Feb 2005 00:06:38 EST (HTML)
Attachment: yosempano1.jpg (80K)
{Photography.80.3}: {tj2} Sat, 26 Feb 2005 10:43:02 EST (0 lines)
{erased by tj2 Sun, 08 Mar 2009 17:54:32 EDT}
{Photography.80.4}: Paddrick Mackin {paddrick} Sat, 26 Feb 2005 11:15:41 EST (5 lines)
So what stitching techniques or programs are being used for creating the panos being posted. How many photos (if you can remember) are being used? I get my panos printed on custom paper at a reasonable price at ezprints.com. Most of my panos are simply two images stitched together in Panaview using manually controlled flags.
{Photography.80.5}: Paddrick Mackin {paddrick} Sat, 26 Feb 2005 11:27:18 EST (HTML)
Attachment: teton_pano3.jpg (81K)
{Photography.80.6}: David Burke {tualatin} Sat, 26 Feb 2005 12:39:55 EST (15 lines)
Some really gorgeous shots, guys! The peak in teton_pano3 looks like a monster emerging from the clouds. A Polish artist friend of mine, Robert Alda, is currently part of a group show - Grenseløs (Boundless) at Stenersenmuseet in Oslo - www.riksutstillinger.no/ksys/print.shtml?pid=1113&ppid=0&rtyp=10 - featuring a series of wacky short videos of himself naked, many with various known landmarks in background. I swear he uses exactly the same Yosemite viewpoint as your's Paddrick in one of them. You didn't see a naked man there did you? Rich, you got some view from your place in Astoria. How goes the search for a permanent pad?
{Photography.80.7}: Paddrick Mackin {paddrick} Sat, 26 Feb 2005 13:40:04 EST (10 lines)
That's a popular viewpoint of the Tetons David. On a clear, still day the reflection in the lake is magnificent. Your friend Robert was not there during my visit, but there are a lot of big lens photographers around me during this shoot. The clouds were showering fresh snow on the mountains at higher elevations and it was cold. I have a snowless film shot of this same view taken about 25 years ago with a Nikon F4 with full reflection in the lake. The clouds presented some unique views from those on an ordinary cloudless day.
{Photography.80.8}: Jenny Reiswig {jreiswig} Sat, 26 Feb 2005 15:34:36 EST (HTML)
This was two pictures, but no tripod. From my not-quite-a-megapixel
Epson in 2000. Kluged together as best I could at the time. I think
I messed up part of the right-side building when I selected the sky to
blur out the line between the two pictures... oh well.
{Photography.80.9}: Jak King {jakking} Sat, 26 Feb 2005 16:00:02 EST (HTML)
{Photography.80.10}: Will Page {willpage} Sat, 26 Feb 2005 16:57:55 EST (2 lines)
Jenny, the only thing wrong I could detect turned out to be a smudge on my monitor. I see no flaws at all! Good job.
{Photography.80.11}: can't sow, but I can crop {willpage} Sat, 26 Feb 2005 17:08:00 EST (HTML)
I have never done the stitching together bit, is this something that you can do with PS Elements?
The other wide shots I take are at a distance, ones I know will be 'horizontally cropped it they are any good at all. Here's one that was ok, a little too much shadow on the right:
{Photography.80.12}: Gary Minniss {gminniss} Sat, 26 Feb 2005 18:36:45 EST (1 line)
Wow! These are really neat! Any tips from the experts on doing this?
{Photography.80.13}: Paddrick Mackin {paddrick} Sat, 26 Feb 2005 21:59:10 EST (13 lines)
Gary, There are software stitching programs that will do this. I've read articles about using Paint Shop Pro, Photo Shop and MGI Photo Suite v 4.0 to do this. I use a program called Panavue. Google "creating panoramic photos" and you will see a lot of interesting links. Individual digital cameras may have to have certain settings involving focus lock and white balance to make a panorama. It also helps to use a camera with the tripod connection centered directly in line with the lens.
{Photography.80.14}: Jenny Reiswig {jreiswig} Sat, 26 Feb 2005 22:08:25 EST (3 lines)
My Olympus camera has a panorama assist feature that shows you little guides to line up each next picture. It's special software that came pre-loaded on Olympus-brand media cards.
{Photography.80.15}: Jak King {jakking} Sat, 26 Feb 2005 23:02:26 EST (3 lines)
I used to use a specialist pano software -- I can't even remember the name now. But these days, the panorama feature in PS CS is so good that I only have a little touching up to do as a rule.
{Photography.80.16}: Tom Coleman {tomcoleman} Sat, 26 Feb 2005 23:20:22 EST (HTML)
{Photography.80.17}: T.J. McGovern {tj2} Sun, 27 Feb 2005 00:14:47 EST (10 lines)
I usually use three or four shots for a pano, sometimes more. I've tried Panavue and all the others and I always go back to Photoshop. The Photomerge feature does a great job, especially if you use the "Advanced Blending" thingy. I don't know if that's in Elements or not, but I'd bet it is. They always need a little touch-up, and occasionaly there's one that just won't work, but the results are usually very good.
{Photography.80.18}: Paddrick Mackin {paddrick} Sun, 27 Feb 2005 01:03:24 EST (HTML)
Below is a pano of 4 images using AutoStitch. The blending mode is fantastic, and it is all automatic. The software is Windows based. The pano was created at 50% of the original images and then resized to 30%. Then it was compressed to be within the posting guidelines. The view is looking north from Petroleum Creek at Shi Shi Beach.
Attachment: shi_north_pano1.jpg (79K)
{Photography.80.19}: Rich Mason {richpix} Sun, 27 Feb 2005 05:42:20 EST (HTML)
I found one stitched picture that's not a panoramic, per se, but is absolutely huge in terms of resolution (2.5 gigapixels): http://www.tpd.tno.nl/smartsite966.html It's kind of fun to see how much resolution it has, even in a Web version.
Here's a screen shot of a detail from that picture (note that the little red square in the inset photo is what is shown in the larger picture):
It points out one of the advantages of making stitched photos,
panoramic or otherwise, rather than using a wider angle lens and then
cropping: more resolution. I could print the picture this topic
started off with at 16 x79.252 inches @ 240 ppi, without resampling.
{Photography.80.20}: Gary Minniss {gminniss} Sun, 27 Feb 2005 07:32:26 EST (2 lines)
Thank you all for your help. I'll have to get out and see I can do this. I like the looks of pano.
{Photography.80.21}: Ed Hawco {ed1} Sun, 27 Feb 2005 09:36:35 EST (HTML)
I use PanoramaMaker (or something like that) that came with my Nikon. It's not bad. Not brilliant, but not bad.
Here's a challenge that most stitching programs would have trouble with -- dealing with straight lines on a 180-degree panorama. The one below was taken in the McGill Metro station in Montreal. (Hand-held.)
{Photography.80.22}: Ed Hawco {ed1} Sun, 27 Feb 2005 09:43:19 EST (HTML)
If you click the image, a larger version will open in a new browser window (1600x296, 380K).
{Photography.80.23}: Gary Minniss {gminniss} Sun, 27 Feb 2005 10:12:04 EST (2 lines)
I could not get the link to work. However, this looks very nice to me. You must have a very steady hand to do this hand held.
{Photography.80.24}: Paddrick Mackin {paddrick} Sun, 27 Feb 2005 13:56:09 EST (1 line)
That sure looks like a sharp corner for a subway Ed :-)
{Photography.80.25}: Paddrick Mackin {paddrick} Sun, 27 Feb 2005 14:00:37 EST (HTML)
Attachment: kalaloch_rocks_pano1.jpg (80K)
![]()
|
|
You are in Guest mode. If you want to post, you'll need to register (we promise it's painless).
Registered users should log in now. (Forgot your password?)
|